The world around us is filled with mysteries. While some have been unraveled, countless others continue to challenge our understanding. These lingering mysteries inspire my curiosity and drive me to explore them in depth. Why, we may wonder, are some mysteries still beyond our reach? The answer often lies within the limits of our scientific knowledge, which does not yet encompass all dimensions of experience. Expanding these limits is essential—and here, philosophy provides valuable insight. Often considered the mother of all sciences, philosophy guides us where empirical science leaves questions unanswered. Ancient Indian philosophy suggests that all sciences are rooted in a fundamental principle: the relationship between cause and effect. Everything within nature operates under this unified principle of cause and effect, which can be regarded as the essence of nature itself.
This fundamental relationship between cause and effect connects all disciplines—cosmology, physics, biology, and psychology. Recognizing this universal principle became the foundation of my own journey. While it may be ambitious to say I’ve fully achieved my goal, glimpsing this relationship has enabled me to develop a model based on these insights. I have applied this model to the fields of cosmology and psychology, publishing several peer-reviewed papers. Recently, I extended this model to explore how biological signals, or phonemes, correlate with psychological interpretations. Through publications, including a paper in Springer, I presented this model as a framework for understanding phonemes and their psychological significance.
This book expands on those initial publications, addressing key aspects of the subject and clarifying questions that arose following the release of my papers. Using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), I provide detailed psychological interpretations of each phoneme, proposing a method to decode the prevailing meaning of words. I have applied this model across various languages, animal sounds, and even physical objects, finding it universally applicable. In addition, I have addressed some key questions that may be raised by modern linguists, including issues such as the use of identical names for different objects, different names for the same object, tests of falsifiability, chain shifts of phonemes, language fixation, morphophonology, patterns of intonation, and more. Regardless of the sound source, these interpretations, as visualized in the model, act as a bridge to intellectual understanding, illustrating how language connects sound and thought within a universal framework.
At last, I humbly submit that the pursuit of knowledge is an infinite journey, one that always holds potential for further refinement and improvement. While I have endeavored to cover all essential aspects of this subject, there may still be questions that remain open or areas that invite deeper exploration. I welcome any queries from readers and would be glad to engage in dialogue to clarify or expand upon any points.
